Open environment
The simplest way is to install a testing bench inside an "open" environment, so not in a "room" dedicated exclusively to the instrument, but in a space shared with other machinery inside a workshop. Sometimes, you can even see testing benches installed on mobile trolleys, even transporting them on the track during events.
This first installation option in an "open environment" certainly allows costs to be substantially contained and leaves room for all types of testing. However, it has a fairly important limit: the more the environment is not very controllable, the more unreliable the results of the tests carried out will be.
Let us explain: we are well aware that testing benches are used to measure the performance of engines. Often it is necessary to evaluate engines in absolute terms (for example: the maximum power is measured) in order to be able to compare them with other engines that have already been tested. Or, on other occasions, a test on the same engine is required, but with two different calibrations or with two different components (for example, piston A and piston B), in order to understand which is the best. In both cases, the differences that can be detected between one test and the next are generally minimal: it is in fact difficult, if not impossible, for example, for an "evolved" piston to bring improvements in the order of a few horsepower, compared to "standard" performance. Therefore, it is important to carry out the two tests in substantially identical conditions, so as to be able to appreciate the real and small improvements (or worsening) that modifications bring with it. However, if the bench is installed in an open environment, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to carry out the two tests under identical conditions. So, absurdly, it may happen that the "standard" piston test records better engine performance than that collected during the test with the "evolved" piston only because the temperatures were more favourable during the testing of the first, when, instead, under identical conditions, the “evolved” piston would have achieved better results than the other engine.
Furthermore, an installation in an open environment makes tests difficult during the hottest seasons: in summer, the operating temperatures rise rapidly with conseqquences (loss of power, variation of parameters and set-up ...) which sometimes lead to stopping the testing or opting for expensive oversized cooling systems.